Can I ask another question? I put it to the group that was here earlier and I'm trying to understand the connection between environmental assessment requirements in this country, the evidentiary implications of environmental assessment processes. I would just assume that proponents of projects who are going through an EA process would be expected to provide quite a considerable amount of information about their organizations, about how they have conducted their affairs in the past, and about their precedent practice in other projects as proponents. If we remove, as the government is proposing or actually doing, all environmental assessments for projects under $10 million, you would not believe how prescriptive that list is, outside of parks and a few other exceptions.
