My understanding of that decision is that strict liability does not mean that there is presumption of guilt. I know Mr. Woodworth to be an excellent lawyer. He believes that Justice Canada has done excellent work.
However, we must know what Justice Canada officials based their work on in order to, among other things, advise the department. In light of the testimony we have heard, whether we approve of it or not—that remains to be determined—it seems to me that Justice Canada should come to explain their position. That is the very least they could do.
I am somewhat surprised. In fact, during the testimony by their officials, Justice Canada remained silent on that issue, perhaps because the government has not consulted enough, and it had not seen what the industry and its workers were proposing.
Nevertheless, Mr. Chair, it seems to me that Justice Canada officials should come back before the committee to explain a number of legal issues.