Thank you. I just want to again make the point that due diligence provisions currently exist in CEPA.
During the 2005 interventions the witnesses have been consistent in their position that they believe they were non-constitutional, but they are indeed constitutional. The other point I wanted to make is that BillC-16 deals with nine different statutes, not just shipping. The effects will not be just on shipping, but right across Canada there will be a higher degree of environmental enforcement. I'm just commenting on Mr. Boucher's concerns that his children maybe shouldn't be in seafaring, or Mr. Lahay, that these statutes are Canada-wide, not just shipping. It sounds to me that shipping wants to be exempt, but the rest of Canada will have to deal with these tougher regulations and tougher enforcements.
I believe we need to have consistency right across our country, including shipping. We do not look at the worst-case scenario, because the worst-case scenario does not apply, or rarely. We need to have good environmental enforcement.
The few minutes that I have left I'd like to pass on to Mr. Woodworth.