Stephen Woodworth at the Environment and Sustainable Development Committee

Yes.

There's nothing new to it, but I will accept G-16.1 and the friendly amendment to replace the word “may” in both proposed subsection 17.1(3) and proposed subsection 17.1(4) with the words “is entitled to”.

(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

(Clause 104 as amended agreed to)

(Clauses 105 to 108 inclusive agreed to)

(Clause 109 as amended agreed to)

(Clauses 110 to 113 inclusive agreed to)

(On clause 114)