Well, it would be a comedy.
I don't really know. I do know that in one of the draft frameworks it was reviewed by DFO scientists, and they concluded that it was not protective of fisheries. Somewhere along the line DFO's role became minimized, I think, and the science and the conclusions were removed as it approached this final phase-one framework.
In terms of where they go from there, I would say the conversation probably excluded the scientists at some point. It became more like “We need to put something in place, so let's maybe take a good stab at something that might work”.