But isn't that the issue, that some groups who formerly did not necessarily support a moratorium are now calling for a moratorium? There's a strong feeling that some areas, wetlands and boreal areas, have to be set aside, because once they're mined, there's no chance to do that. Is that not why they're frustrated, that there's just continuing dialogue, and in the meantime there are projects being approved that will clear those areas?
On May 13th, 2009. See this statement in context.