Very good. Thank you for that.
I understand that sometimes you get asked difficult questions pertaining to policy, which is the realm of politicians, so I'm not going to ask you specifically about whether you think a policy is a good policy or a poor policy. But as it pertains to the fish habitat management program, was the assessment of the policy objectives and the plans in place more relevant in your study, or was it more relevant to measure successes or failures in relation to the plans that were set out from the policies? If you understand the nature of my question...what I'm asking is, were the plans sufficient in order to fulfill the policies? And if so, what's your assessment of the overall plans in relation to the policies? Were they adequate, and would they stand the test? And would you know if they were or were not?