We looked at this in 2006. Actually, we looked at a number of programs in Natural Resources Canada, which has the departmental lead on these files. We said good things about it in 2006 and we have said good things about it again now, concerning wind energy and the types of energy they're promoting. They are actually providing funding for this to happen in Canada, which is a good thing. It's generating greenhouse gas emissions reductions over time. This has been a “good news” story for a number of years over a number of governments, in terms of that department's activities.
Is it perfect? No, it's not. We made some recommendations back in 2006. We didn't have any recommendations this time. We were only looking to see whether there is an adequate rationale in coming up with their targets. We said they can demonstrate to us that there is an adequate rationale. We had a problem with the approach the government used of a “business as usual” scenario, which wasn't clear, we said, and wasn't really transparent about how it all works together.