I do not want to stir up a debate like Mr. Trudeau, but I feel that the witness's remarks are at the very heart of the current debate and the review of the act. If we let the witness continue, we will realize that he has even proposed amendments for the Species at Risk Act. We are in the middle of reviewing the act. The witness is speaking directly to the topic and he is going to provide us with his proposed amendments. That being the case, I feel that he is perfectly entitled to continue his testimony in the way he has been presenting it up to now.
