Did anything come of that consultation? That seems to be the default answer of governments, that they can't act but they'll consult with each other, and then it sort of gets lost.
Last week, or two weeks ago, the Commissioner of the Environment issued a report in which he said DFO really lacks proper baseline data on fish habitat, for example. Would that be a factor in terms of the future effectiveness of the Species at Risk Act? Is that an impediment to determining which fish species should be protected? Is that part of the larger equation you're talking about today?