I think the principle applies to hunting-type legislation, to offences where people go out and intentionally harm. Definitely, that approach is applicable there. But when that approach is taken to a regulatory setting, where we're talking about strict liability offences, things that could happen beyond your control--and then you start arguing due diligence and how much you should have done to prevent it--I think we have to look very carefully at that one extreme objective of protecting every individual of every species in every situation.
