Yes. We don't disagree on that point, absolutely.
Again, the problem is that when the law is written as a command and control and enforcement-based approach where an offence is created for each individual impairment, that's where the problem arises. What you've heard from industry here is that we want to accomplish that goal of protection of species in a reasonable way but not be caught in the trap of enforcement and punitive actions for each and every individual event.
But we're in complete agreement on the objective of the act, and hopefully the broader approaches to stewardship are what will accomplish that.