I'd like to go back to Mr. Calkins' points, which I thought were very good. He said farmers will essentially self-regulate, in the sense that they know what's good for their farm in terms of environmental protection and so on. I buy that up to a point. When it comes to things like the runoff of fertilizer into rivers that move downstream, they don't really have a stake in what they're doing. They're passing the problem along to people downstream.
How do you get around this problem that you have to have confidentially on the one hand, but on the other hand you're giving money that may not be effective because it's not in the interest of a farmer to take a particular environmental precaution?