Mr. Chair, I wanted to get a sense from you of how the Office of the Environment Commissioner handles, for audit purposes, the measuring results, if you will, for jurisdictions that are shared with the provinces. Two things come to mind.
One, as I mentioned, is the acrylonitrile situation where the second emitting source is provincially regulated. The federal government has made some determination that the provincial regulations are satisfactory. What's it going to take for you to feel satisfied that results are sufficient from that?
The example with respect to environmental farm plants, which are accepted or proved, if you will, by the provinces and territories--we co-fund those things and there is some amount of recognition provincially for that through the Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association. They give out awards and recognition for the completion of environmental farm programs. It has to be approved by some mechanism before payout happens. What would it take for you to be satisfied with that? If there's a gap there, what would satisfy you as the Commissioner of the Environment for auditing purposes?
I want to leave that on the record. Thank you, Mr. Chair, for letting me get that out.