I'm speaking in favour of the amendment, Mr. Chair. I'm not sure we need to be that prescriptive with respect to the motion. I think there has to be some amount of give and take when it comes to witness lists and things like that. I certainly wouldn't want to put the constraint on you with respect to who has to be here.
I think the experience of the committee is that there has been a fair balance. Even with politically contentious issues where we've had very divergent opinions, I think the ultimate attempt when it comes to fashioning witness testimony at the committee has been very balanced. I don't feel we've been shortchanged, for example, so I'm not sure we need to be this prescriptive in the motion. That's why I'm supporting the subamendment—or the amendment.