If your report had only talked about whether or not severe weather warning verification systems were in place, I wouldn't be nearly so concerned, but the problem I'm having is that your report contains a conclusion at 2.82 that Environment Canada systems do not adequately support the delivery of timely and accurate severe weather warnings. That makes it appear to me that you are saying that Environment Canada systems in fact don't deliver timely and accurate severe weather warnings.
You can see why I consider it a good news story. Out of what you reported to be now 15,000 severe weather warnings every year, when you were looking for cases of severe weather warnings that were not timely or not reliable, and with all the data you had from public opinion surveys, storm surveys, case studies, and other feedback, do you see why I consider it a good news story that there is not a single case of unreliable or untimely severe weather warnings that you thought worth including in your report? I just want to say that in light of that, I don't agree with your conclusion at 2.82. I thin, in fact your report confirms exactly the opposite, that out of 15,000 cases there is not a single report worth mentioning of an untimely or inaccurate report.