You mean that the context must be continental.
At the same time, when I look at what is being done in the United States and Canada, I have the feeling that… You commended the government today for its investments in carbon capture and storage. So, you believe that Canada has to reduce its carbon footprint, but that CO2 capture and storage is the way to go in order for that to happen. In the meantime, the United States has decided to invest massively in renewable energy.
What I am hearing from people in the wind energy sector is that we are missing the boat and the green shift here in Canada, and that Canadian companies are considering no longer investing in Canada, and are heading to the United States because their tax and regulatory regimes are more favourable.
Are we not ensuring that the Canadian economy will remain in the Stone Age in terms of its development, while the United States, in the meantime, is adapting its tax and regulatory regimes?
Let's talk about the flight of capital, because it is often said that climate change regulations result in an outflow of capital. In the final analysis, is our current policy not resulting in an outflow of capital that could be invested in the industries and technologies of the future, such as sustainable and environmentally-friendly energy?