Yes. I take your point, and that's why we're for pricing. It will start unleashing creative and innovative actions by people around the economy, and the broader it applies the more we're going to get out of it.
With regard to pricing, “Turning the Corner” had a projection of $65 a tonne for 2018 or so. We haven't heard anybody else--certainly nobody south of the border--talking about those kinds of numbers.
I think Mr. Page's number of $100 a tonne is dependent on Canada meeting a lot of its target through purchasing foreign credits. That's not getting to 20% below 2006 emissions; it's getting halfway there or so, and buying credits for the rest.
I guess what we have been pushing is let's get going. We have to start in Alberta. Saskatchewan is talking about doing the same thing, and B.C. has surpassed it by applying it across the board. If we get way ahead.... If we had $100 a tonne and the U.S. had $20, we'd have a lot of problems in managing our electricity prices, our industry costs, and all of those things. We'd be in real economic trouble trying to do that.
Our argument is that it's okay to get going ahead of the U.S. in the way that we have when the costs are manageable, but any ramp-up has to be contingent on the U.S. and other major economies doing it. After all, if they're not doing it, we're not getting anywhere globally.