Yes, but there is regulatory uncertainty south of the border as well.
I think if we were to add on something that multiplied the regulatory uncertainty in Canada, my point was that this would be a death knell for anything, and soon, such as for upgraders where people just say, “I can't invest; I'm not going to put down billions of dollars in this environment until I know what the costs are going to be relative to my competitors.”
I think the policy is not about the sustainability of the oil and gas industry that you talked about in your earlier point. It's about supplying energy to Canadians. We don't have any easy answers. If there were easy answers, we would do them. But they're aren't any easy answers to replacing coal in the next ten years in Alberta.
What is it that we're going to meet it with? Wind is getting up to the limit on what that system can take. It's a thermal system. Unless with every coal plant you put another gas-fired turbine next to it to meet the fluctuations in supply and match the demand.... You know, you can't just build out wind indefinitely.
I'm in Mr. Turk's territory here, but I spent a lot of time in electricity in a former life, and I know that there are system requirements. And oil and gas? I don't see anybody giving up gasoline and diesel yet. So the development of the Canadian oil supply and the oil sands is providing a secure source in North America. It's an economic opportunity. We're doing what we can on technology and on implementing what is already available to reduce the emissions intensity of this activity. But--