We're not looking for our sector to come out on top of other sectors. We're just looking to be able to keep the jobs we have in rural Canada. If you're talking about the trade-off between, say, oil and gas, and the forestry sector, we don't want to be disadvantaged to accommodate oil and gas. We want to make certain that what's done recognizes our position.
The reference to Finland wasn't to say that we should restructure our economy like theirs. We can't and we won't. But we would do well to learn from some of the smart players in global competition that we should enter this not as innocents but with a sense of self-interest as a country. So let's get our greenhouse gases down, and let's do it in a way that's responsible and aggressive. But at the same time, let's recognize that this creates a marketplace, a global, policy-driven marketplace that has huge implications for jobs for Canadians. In addition to wanting to see the regulatory scheme, we want to see a policy stance that asks where the jobs are and that integrates future employment into the thinking. We think Finland has it right.