I'm not going to ask you to comment on the specific testimony of Canadian scientists before this panel a few weeks ago, but the basis for differentiation of targets between developed and developing countries is the application of, if I understand it correctly, an equity interpretation. I did question Canadian scientists as to whether that's a standard scientific term, and they unanimously said it was not. So I just take issue.... Science may inform us in a certain direction, but there are other non-scientific applications applied to that particular decision.
You did also mention that the European Union has lowered its target. For the record and for Canadians who are watching, of course, and want to know, from what level in what baseline year to what level and what baseline year did you lower the European target?