So you're suggesting that something that's minus 9% or 10% below 1990 versus if we adopted minus 25% below 1990 by 2020 wouldn't be a problem? Is that what you're suggesting?
On November 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.
On November 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.
November 26th, 2009 / 12:35 p.m.
Conservative
Jeff Watson Conservative Essex, ON
So you're suggesting that something that's minus 9% or 10% below 1990 versus if we adopted minus 25% below 1990 by 2020 wouldn't be a problem? Is that what you're suggesting?
See context to find out what was said next.