I think it's important that we have targets that are very similar in our sector to the Americans, for the reasons you've outlined and that I talked about in our submission. If we're much less onerous than the Americans, we're going to face border measures, and we're very concerned about that. They're a hugely important market for us. If we're much higher than the Americans, it's going to be competitively difficult in Canada. So we have a very narrow window to play with. And it's also a sectoral window.
One of the reasons it's important to move in pace with the Americans is their system is so much in flux. There was speculation in The Economist magazine a couple of weeks ago that some of the manufacturing sectors may not be covered in the States. That's not their current legislation, but we need to wait and see how that fleshes out.