That's a good question.
My description of the council is that basically you have individuals who have been involved in the Species at Risk Act for approximately 10 or 15 years, a much longer time than the five or six years that SARA has been in place. You have a body of individuals who started as an aboriginal working group. The vision of that working group has been carried on regardless of the actual changes or of how NACOSAR is written into the Species at Risk Act.
Their vision, I believe, is in conflict with their position or with the powers they are given under the act. That is sort of how I would describe NACOSAR as a whole.