As I mentioned in my brief, I think the important thing is that we do need to bring people to the table and make sure that the duplication that exists in the system and the many different processes is simplified.
Obviously there's a cost to doing conservation work, so I don't want to downplay the financial side of it. On the other hand, there are probably quite a bit of useful savings to bringing people together and looking at solutions together, so both levels of government...I would say there's not only benefit economically, but there's also benefit in terms of the outcomes. When we look at trying to make the type of connectivity that needs to be made for species in a lot of cases, and given the patchwork of federal and provincial jurisdictions, there has to be a way for us to be able to find those corridors and that connectivity in a way that makes sense for conservation on a broader scale. So we're not stepping on the toes of provinces or first nations, but at the same time bringing them together and talking through what those solutions are.
I would say a first ministers meeting is an interesting idea. I might even go further to say that it needs to incorporate industrial partners and first nations. It does need to be a rather interesting and more collaborative approach than I think we've had in the past.