I guess I am somewhat confused by the reference to peer review, because I usually think of that as a scientific process, not a policy process as such—although I agree with you that policy determination should be transparent and that there may be more that could be done in that respect.
The point at which this comes into play is at the recovery stage. I am having difficulty with the concept that even a strategy can be done simply on a scientific level without democratic decision-making being involved which takes account of what people need to do from a democratic point of view. So can you help me out with what you envision for the recovery process?