Correct me if I'm wrong, but you advocate an educational approach when it comes to protecting habitats and species at risk, that is to say, you favour education over a shotgun approach. However, there is one reality that we must contend with at the same time.
Take the Great Lakes Basin, for example. I read somewhere today that industries discharge five million kilograms of pollutants into the Great Lakes Basin.
Are you saying that SARA won't necessarily guarantee us a healthy ecosystem? What about other pieces of legislation, specifically the Canadian Environmental Protection Act?
Do you think other acts need to be strengthened? I'm only trying to understand your position. When it comes to species protection, do you believe education is the key? Other acts need to be strengthened, in addition to SARA. Is that what you're saying? I'm just trying to understand your overall position.