I notice that you said there was a boundary of 10 kilometres, but as we have learned--as my colleague from the Bloc has said--from the situation in the Gulf of Mexico, where they said they didn't have to have the relief well because it was 30 or 50 kilometres off... I'm wondering on what basis you set that 10-kilometre boundary. Did matters factor in? I flipped through your report quickly because I was interested in the mineral interests. When I was an assistant deputy minister for renewable resources in the Yukon, we were negotiating park agreements there, and that's obviously a big issue. Do you remove it? Do you put the boundary around it? I notice in here they note there are not substantial oil and gas reserves, so there wasn't much to give up. But I'm wondering, looking at the area, if there are substantial oil and gas reserves at a certain point offshore. Does anybody know if there are, or was that part of setting the boundary?
On June 8th, 2010. See this statement in context.