I just want to touch on one more thing.
I can't read your name there, sir. Mr. Denstedt, could you elaborate on this? It was brought up earlier, the Oldman River Dam case that happened several years ago in the province that I live in, Alberta. Isn't the fact that there was an actual case brought forward and it was actually dealt with through civil action already proof that we don't need to do any more to augment the system? Where there's a gross dereliction of duty by the federal government in any particular case, we already have a broad scope application of civil litigation, do we not, in this country? Why do we need more?