Yes, exactly; that's precisely what it is.
We experienced a very seasoned regulator in the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board. We had three to four weeks of hearings, we had several dozen witnesses, we had several hundred pages of analysis and expert testimony, and the tests we had to meet were known. The tests at the NEB were known and we still got taken to the Supreme Court.
It's my understanding of this particular legislation that even though you meet those tests—and it cost us several million dollars to meet those tests—if somebody didn't like it, they would be able to say, “I think there's another impact that you haven't thought of”.
So the years and decades of regulatory certainty that had been developed.... I'll give you an example now. We have to move our centre line 20 feet, because we are in a road allowance. We have to go to the Alberta Utilities Commission to move it 20 feet and we have to invite comment from anybody within 800 metres—and we are doing that, because that is the test today, 800 metres.
It's highly unlikely, but it's possible that even though the Alberta Ministry of Transportation is telling me, “move it, because you're in our road allowance”, and it's only 20 feet, we could have our permit held up on appeal of that move under this thing.