I'm not surprised by the presentations to do with duplication by the intervenors here, because that has been the practice of industry: to argue that we should be getting rid of the federal government in environmental regulation because we have the provinces.
One of you had tabled a legal opinion by Osler and company, I think. It was interesting, there was a selective quote from what is an extremely historic case, and that's the Friends of the Oldman. Is it not true that the reason the Friends of the Oldman is an important case is that the Supreme Court declared that the federal government has jurisdiction over the environment?