Let me start by saying I think we have a premise we agree on. I think your point was that we all agree that environmental protection and environmental standards are important. We do, I think, all agree on that.
We come back to what is the necessity for this provision. We take the view that Canada is a country with very high standards of environmental laws and a lot of opportunity for impacted parties to intervene. To us, the law is not so directly about the environment but about creating a sweeping class of individuals and organizations that would have standing to sue. And from our point of view, that is a very negative development in terms of it reducing the balance around sustainable development, about energy, environment, and social factors. And environmental factors being looked at together creates a tremendous amount of uncertainty and a tremendous amount of lack of balance from where we sit.
As I said, we think in some ways it addresses the wrong thing. It isn't about environmental standards; it's about giving everybody the right to go to court. We're not supportive of that in this circumstance.