We have spoken and will continue to speak on the question of balance. We think sustainable development is about the economy, it's about social factors, and it's about the environment. Certainly those are the sorts of things the Brundtland commission, for example, talked about--all three--and the importance of balancing them and advancing them all. We feel that by making one value paramount at a quasi-constitutional level, this bill does threaten that balance that we think is very important to the country and that we think Canadians believe is not only important but also possible.
My intergenerational fairness question was just a quick example to make the point that someone might be inclined to intervene against an environmental group but might not have the wherewithal to be there. You could see an individual like that or a family like that unable to intervene on the other side of one of these court actions and yet feeling that they want X, Y, or Z development to go forward because they feel it's in the long-term interest of their family or their children.