I'd be happy to briefly answer that. I'm not deeply involved with that particular act and I have not been involved in commenting on the review.
There are a number of pieces of environmental legislation, of course, that are in the course of review now, as this House knows: the Species at Risk Act, CEAA, etc. We are involved in those, and of course in some ways it's an example of the access that a broad number of Canadians have to these processes. These types of associations are involved in commenting and testifying on those reviews, as are a number of environmental and other groups.
I'm pleased to say that in some cases around some aspects of SARA a broad group of energy and other industries have submitted joint submissions with a range of environmental groups. I think it just underlines that there is a lot of access to the process and a lot of opportunity in this democratic society for people to put their views out on the table inside the legislative process, which tends to be where we think these sorts of rules--the law--should be made.