Of course not. We're suggesting that people who are directly impacted should obviously have the ability to intervene or be involved in projects where they are impacted, as they've been very liberally under NEB and other sorts of hearings. We're suggesting it is a bridge too far to give standing to everyone who perceives themselves as interested in their own minds the right to intervene and bring actions on any decision of government relating to environmental policy.
On November 15th, 2010. See this statement in context.