I think the bill is established specifically to permit legal proceedings above the regulatory processes that are in place today. As such, of course, we would expect to see a lot of actions. It's an interesting question as to whether or not they would be forward-looking--i.e., about new projects, or even challenges to existing operations and situations that are permitted already. I certainly believe that it would be easy to abuse the law.
Monsieur Bigras asked the key question: Can you make this law better and make it useful? One of the prime considerations would be the possibility of abuse, whether it be someone in Alberta or Ontario who wants to challenge a project running in Quebec because they want to disadvantage that project for as long as possible, or even a business competitor who is already running a permitted project, seeing a new competitor enter and saying “I will just stop them as long as I possibly can with as many actions”, because there is no frivolous defence here.