As it's currently drafted, the bill has no protection against that, so yes, of course.
You said that everyone in testimony supported the purpose of the bill. But I don't actually agree. The bill proposes to install individual action to the court over the regulatory processes that have been constructed at the provincial and federal levels. And I don't believe that the court is a better equipped agency for evaluating environmental impact, period. I don't believe that judges are trained and resourced to do what can be done today.