That's good to know.
The other amendment I will be proposing is to remove subclause 23.(3), which is causing a lot of consternation among industries that have contacted us about the bill. It says it is not a defence to civil action under subclause 23.(1) that the activity was authorized by an act or a regulation. In other words, as I understand it, removing this would take a lot of the uncertainty away. Industry feels that even if it conforms to regulations and laws it's still vulnerable. If we took that out, would it make the bill more acceptable to you?