Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you for your testimony. I have a sympathy for the quick talking. We're a limited option here, but I think you'll find you'll have more than enough time to elaborate.
I want to go a bit to the heart of your presentation, to the idea that everything is good, that there is not anything further needed. We were told by other witnesses that 160 of 192 countries have some form of rights for environmental protection frameworks. Presumably, that's where either your members are also operating or potentially competing with operations. I wonder if there's something specifically about this framework, compared to some of those other ones, some of which seemed to bear real constitutional and therefore hierarchical legal authority. Why would this one be so much more difficult, more onerous, and unacceptable, as you seem to be saying to your members?