That's how we see it. The bill would introduce uncertainty, and that's why I say that it could interfere with our other efforts to promote environmental improvement. Our industry has been especially successful in adopting various measures for improving the environment. We are well aware that our development activities have consequences and that many things must be done in compliance with the regulations. Other measures, unrelated to the regulations, must also be adopted to improve the situation.
The problem is that this costs money, of course, and it requires and diverts resources. Improving the environment is something we take seriously and are committed to. If a bill were to introduce a new level of uncertainty, it would force us to reassess our additional efforts, and would perhaps bring us to question whether we should be involved in environmental improvement initiatives. If something like this were done, we could end up wondering...