Thanks for the question.
I think our members are focused on the constant improvement nature of environmental regulation and legislation, and I think many of them would never contend that we be complacent by any stretch. Environmental protection is an evolving issue and we must stay vigilant on it. Our members are dedicated to this.
When you mention that there are many other countries around the world that have this form of protection or legislation, true, from our understanding, and indeed even at the provincial level, as was mentioned, the province of Quebec, at a provincial level, has a component of this in their charter of freedom and liberties.
The difference is that in our reading of the bill and examining it, we do not feel there are enough safeguards to prevent obstructionist attempts through litigation to our projects or to any other projects, and that's the part that concerns us, I think, most gravely in this. In the Quebec context, as I was mentioning, there's a provision there that you can bring challenges but you can't challenge the permits that have been issued, for example. You can challenge other aspects. Our member companies operate within that. They operate comfortably within it. But this piece seems to be missing some of that.