No, we haven't been seeking those types of changes. Indeed, I think elements of this bill that can be found in existing legislation throughout are not areas of contention for us. It's the sum total of the bill that gives us cause for concern after we've received our permits, after we've complied with all those existing pieces of legislation that we must deal with and that we do operate within.
This is another after-the-fact opportunity for our projects to be potentially delayed, and we do believe there is a potential for obstructionist approaches to be taken. For us, as I mentioned earlier, it's eight to fourteen years under current legislation. We do abide within it. We do manage to build projects under that framework, for sure. Now that it can be after the fact, the question we have is what this will potentially represent in terms of further delay. We see many different new avenues and opportunities for that. That's our concern.