Perhaps I would go so far as to say that perhaps I've overstated that in the sense that when I'm talking about comparability in my comments, I'm talking at a very general level, in that both pieces of legislation invite the public to participate in some kind of civil action.
In fact, to be very clear, and thank you for the question, it breaks down very quickly and it is quite different. The civil action envisaged under the provincial Environmental Bill of Rights is quite focused on allowing public nuisance claims, which is something that is set down in common law and widely recognized. It really releases the block that exists with the Attorney General.