I don't know that I'm going to be much help. You can appreciate that I've not seen this previously in a statute where the defendant is the government. It's a presumption, and I don't want it to be seen as advice, but I would presume that because the action is between two parties, the court would order Canada to provide collateral to the other party in the action, but it's not spelled out here. I do think that may give the court some leeway.
On November 22nd, 2010. See this statement in context.