Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Is quite unfortunate to see this filibustering reappear just when we stopped studying this bill. We have not had the opportunity to discuss it. Setting it aside without even talking about it seems to me to be quite irresponsible for parliamentarians. I believe our role is to look at the bills that are proposed in a fair and reasonable manner. Were we to just set it aside without having even looked at it, we would not play our role in as parliamentarians. Mr. Warawa could very well move his motion afterwards if we were unable to amend the bill according to his wishes. We should at least try to amend the bill according to our various requirements.
I do not agree with those who claim that all the witnesses said that the bill should be set aside. Some of them did indeed say so, Mr. chair, in line with their own interests, of course. We could easily see that. However, most of the witnesses said that this is a good bill or a bill that should be amended. I believe that is why we are here.
Amendments are being proposed, some of them even by the NDP. It seems to me that we should look at them without trying to delay proceedings or by taking too much time in order to get everybody fed up with this bill. As serious parliamentarians, we should look at the amendments one after the other. If after doing this work seriously, Mr. Warawa still believes that the bill is unacceptable, he would be able to move his motion. So, our first order of business, I believe, should be to try and see if this bill can be amended or not. My answer is yes.