I was going to make the same point that I think someone else made, which is that if Mr. Warawa and the government party find certain parts of the bill offensive, or the disagree with them, they can amend the bill. That's all they have to do. Then I suppose they can use their majority in the Senate to kill it before it gets to second reading. That will be their choice.
Second, just because witnesses suggest that we do something doesn't mean we have to jump to do it. That logic could take us to some very strange places.
That's all I really had to say.