I'm fine with letting him go on and on, Mr. Chair, but on a point of order, the member is misrepresenting the testimony. It's one thing to say, and that's fine, some witnesses suggested they wouldn't accept the bill unless there were substantial changes, and even then they wouldn't. But it is completely misrepresenting the testimony we heard to say that all of the witnesses asked us to kill the bill.
I don't really understand the point where Mr. Warawa is going. If he's almost finished, maybe we can actually discuss his motion.