Mr. Chair, we do not see this kind of motion very often. If there are people on your list who want to contribute to a debate, normally the debate carries on. As for Ms. Duncan's motion, I was under the impression that she was trying to end the current sitting. In that event, we would resume the debate at the next meeting. Usually, we call that filibustering in the government's case. It is pretty rare to put an end to filibustering in this manner. You ruled that the motion was in order, and I will remember that. Since I plan to be here for a few more years yet, I might be able to use that tactic every now and again.
Essentially, the motion before us right now is trying to do the same thing as the motion that was previously moved and discussed. On the same point of order, it seems to me that the spirit of the motion before us, which was ruled in order, is basically identical to what was put forward earlier, in other words, that we put a time limit on the study of this bill.