Let me give you another example, just to make clear where I would expect real targets can be set up so that you can measure whether the government has actually delivered. Another one is under Public Works, on page 9, concerning greening government operations, where the suggestion is that there will be action taken towards green government.
The Obama government, in its last budget—not this one—targeted that 75% of federal government buildings will be energy retrofitted in two years. I don't see any kind of real targets here or target dates whereby you could measure whether the government is actually delivering. It remains incredibly vague to me. I would have thought that, given that you have these guideline documents on how you might do it, it's much more helpful to measure whether the government is actually moving in a certain direction.
Concerning aboriginal safe drinking water, the government gave an end date: they said they would table that legislation last year. That's an example of how you hold the government accountable. Then they can say, here are the reasons that we couldn't deliver on that target date. But when you have no target date whatsoever, it becomes pretty amorphous, and it doesn't look as though it's a real commitment to a deliverable.
Thank you.