Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have thought about the various arguments that have been made around the table and the validity of many of them: the validity of the idea of spending more time on the contentious clauses and the validity of each person having an opportunity to express themselves and the concerns of their constituencies. I note that the original motion allows for 90 hours of debate--if each party took its full five minutes for each of the clauses it would be approximately 90 hours of debate--so that would restrict debate to 20 minutes per clause. Clearly some clauses won't warrant that, but some may warrant more.
So I would like to propose an amendment to the motion so that there would be eight minutes per party. Other than that, the motion would be the same.